I’ve always been a big fan of the North Amherst Library, and not just because it’s near my house at the edge of town and I drive past it every day. It is in fact one of the town’s hidden architectural and cultural gems. Founded in 1869 by 45 residents who paid fees to use it, the library was opened to residents in 1873 and incorporated in 1875. After the schoolhouse that held the collections succumbed to fire (a not uncommon fate for Amherst buildings in that era), a combination of private donations and public funding permitted construction of the current building, designed by Roswell F. Putnam of nearby Leverett and and dedicated in 1893. The site thus has the distinction of being home to both the earliest public library and the earliest public library building in town.
With its small but revolving, steadily updated collection and role as an exchange center for loan items from both within and beyond the Amherst libraries, the diminutive structure generates much more use than the casual visitor could possibly imagine. Add to that the dedicated staff and outreach efforts such as story time and the summer reading program, and you can see how it functions as a true multigenerational social hub of the North Amherst village center.
When we first moved to the area, the library was painted a uniform, somewhat-the-worse-for-wear, and unhistorical white. Our stereotypical vision of the New England town probably includes white, clapboarded houses and churches. Nowadays, this passes for simplicity in frugality. What most people probably do not realize is that it wasn’t until about the 1830s that white came into its own. Before that, many buildings were unpainted or used darker colors. (I often ask my students: If you were living in the hinterlands of Colonial western Massachusetts and wanted to make your own paint for a building, how would you do it? They get the point: one would turn first to mineral earths or vegetable dyes; hence the prevalence of reds and browns based on iron oxide. White paint required pigments derived from from chemically treated lead.) As commercial paint preparations came on the market in the later nineteenth century, a proliferation of new colors (many derived from new substances and processes) became more practical as well as fashionable.
An early photograph gives a hint of the library’s variegated hues, and a postcard shows the actual colors.
In 1996-97, the building was repainted in its original colors and the interior restored thanks to a very generous (then-anonymous) gift from William Holland (father of current Jones Library Trustee Chair Pat Holland).
The library is now in the midst of a double makeover.
At the close of last month, at the very end of the warm weather just before the incessant rains hit, workers began cleaning the exterior in preparation for repainting, funded (along with some modest electrical and insulation work on the interior) by $ 12,000 for historic preservation from the Community Preservation Act (CPA) that Town Meeting voted earlier this year.
However, as I pointed out at the time, although the Historical Commission is always pleased to support the needs of our valued libraries, the fact that the structure had not been repainted since the original restoration nearly 15 years ago gave one pause. Regular touch-up and occasional full repainting are part of normal maintenance, an obligation that falls on owners of Colonial mansions and contemporary ranch houses alike. Unfortunately, if enough time elapses, deferred maintenance turns into preservation work. This was the conundrum—greater by several orders of magnitude—that we faced when Town officials first suggested using CPA funds to repair the Town Hall masonry. Although numerous projects are worthy and could conceivably qualify as historic preservation work in any given year, there is a great temptation, particularly in times of fiscal constraint, to fund as many undertakings as possible outside the regular budget, and CPA cannot become a piggy bank for use on rainy days. Otherwise, local historical commissions, which have clearly defined mandates under state law, are forced to set aside their own carefully devised priorities and respond instead to external, ad hoc demands.
The key is good strategic planning. Our Historical Commission works on the basis of a ten-year Preservation Plan. In the realm of town government as a whole, our new Master Plan furnishes the prime directives. In addition, the Select Board has in recent years begun to emphasize rational planning and the long-term view, thus avoiding some of the penny-wise and pound-foolish mistakes of the more distant past. Since I have joined that body, I have been very pleased and encouraged to see how this approach is reflected across the board (no pun intended), from the setting of the Town Manager's performance goals, to the work of the Joint Capital Planning Committee (JCPC), on which I serve—along with two Library Trustees.
Clearly, the Library (like the town itself in the case of Town Hall) in the past simply did not plan ahead, and ironically, the windfall gift of the 1996-97 restoration may have brought about a false complacency and helped to postpone precisely the sort of strategic thinking that was necessary. One simply cannot do business that way today.
I am gratified to see that the Library is now engaged in applying more sustainable principles in its own domain. Indeed, long-term and strategic planning appears high on the list of the Trustees' priorities (more on that in a later post). The Historical Commission successfully supported additional CPA funding for the preservation of the collections and building of the main Jones Library branch: $ 40,000 for restoration of the slate roof and $ 75,000 for archival climate control, as well as $ 20,000 for the latest installment in a joint document conservation project involving Jones Library Special Collections and the Town Clek's office.
It was not only CPA funds that were at work on the North Amherst Library. Over a year ago, the immense and stately beech that had reigned over that landscape succumbed to disease and had to be cut down. The town planted in its place a Princeton Elm (a new variety derived from one of the few disease-resistant old specimens), donated by Hadley Garden Center. This weekend, volunteers, inspired and guided by Trustee Chair Pat Holland, continued recently begun improvements to the now open triangular lawn on which the library sits, planting shrubs and autumn flowers.
Carpenter and Morehouse, in their History of the Town of Amherst (1896), describe the library as "a neat and ornamental structure." it is becoming such once again, with grounds to match.
"In fiction, the principles are given, to find
the facts: in history, the facts are given,
to find the principles; and the writer
who does not explain the phenomena
as well as state them performs
only one half of his office."
Thomas Babington Macaulay,
"History," Edinburgh Review, 1828
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Monday, October 11, 2010
Gazette on Library Director's Retirement
The Gazette today publicized news of Jones Library Director Bonnie Isman's retirement.
Just a year ago, things seemed so much better.
Update: another report
• Diane Lederman, "Jones Library Director Bonnie J. Isman will depart in December," The Republican, 13 Oct.
. . . .In the meantime, it seems, my recent hopes for progress and reconciliation were premature: the trustees are at each other's throats again. It's sad. All no doubt believe themselves to be devoted to the best interests of one of the town's most important and beloved institutions, but everyone—trustees, staff, public, and the institution itself—loses as a result of the strife.
Isman, whose performance evaluation this summer sparked controversy among members of the library trustees, informed staff and trustees Friday that she will be stepping down Dec. 10.
"I've been there for 30 years. It's a good, round number," said Isman, reached at her Amherst home Monday. "I've been planning to retire in 2010 for a couple of years.". . . . . .
Isman said the announcement of her retirement gives trustees two months to establish a process of recruiting and hiring a successor and implementing a transition plan.
Isman praised the "great, creative staff" with whom she has worked and thanked the numerous residents who have been dedicated trustees and spoken up for the public library system in the community. (read the rest)
Just a year ago, things seemed so much better.
Happier times: dedication of the Robert Frost plaque, October 2009
![]() |
Director Bonnie Isman |
![]() | |||||
Trustee Chair Pat Holland and State Sen. Stan Rosenberg |
Update: another report
• Diane Lederman, "Jones Library Director Bonnie J. Isman will depart in December," The Republican, 13 Oct.
Monday Morning Leaves: A Delayed Amherst Autumn and a Bouquet for Orra Hitchcock
Sept. 21
Neither when I crossed the Connecticut River at Hadley via the Calvin Coolidge Memorial Bridge nor when I paused at the "scenic" overlook above Holyoke on the way back from the auto glass shop in West Springfield did I see much fall foliage. However, here in the uplands, signs of the change were more common. I noticed them on the dog's morning walk (in fact: spotted the first ones, below, on Labor Day weekend, which is the symbolic if not astronomical end of summer).
Oct. 4
Last week, I would have written that we were still ahead of the game (and the season), but when I retraced that same route along I-91 today, there was still far more green than red and orange to be seen, even at the overlook.
Now people are starting to worry. Just today, Springfield's Channel 22 quoted people in the hospitality trades expressing concern that the delayed leaf-peeping season was hurting tourism. The foliage is supposed to reach peak color just after the Columbus Day weekend.
Coincidentally, the Library of Congress today posted its list of readings on "The Nature & Science of Autumn."
It's ironic that this year's season is causing worries because Yankee Magazine recently named Amherst one of the top 25 foliage towns in autumn New England:
This lithograph, "Autumnal Scenery, View in Amherst" (from the volume of plates for Edward Hitchcock's Geology of Massachusetts, 1833), depicts Amherst as seen from the east, in the Pelham Hills. Amherst College (Johnson Chapel; South, North, and Williston Halls) is at far left. What is perhaps most noteworthy about the scenery is the relative paucity of trees compared with the view that would greet the traveler today. Hitchcock painted the scene at the height of deforestation, by which time, as the Fisher Museum of Harvard Forest explains, "60 to 80 percent of the land was cleared for pasture, tillage, orchards and buildings. Small remaining areas of woodland were subjected to frequent cuttings for lumber and fuel."
Here, in her husband's Religious Lectures on Peculiar Phenomena in the Four Seasons. . . (Amherst: J. S. &. C. Adams, 1850), she depicted the "Autumnal Scenery" at the "Confluence of Connecticut and Deerfield Rivers," to the west.
For Edward Hitchcock, as the volume's title implies, nature was a book to be studied for its spiritual message. Opening his lecture on "The Euthanasia of Autumn" (probably not a title that we would choose today, though it just means: good death) with Isaiah's 'We all do fade as a leaf" (64:6), he finds that the season instructs: our bodily powers, beauty, and glory are fleeting. Accordingly, autumn ought to teach us piety, strength in adversity, and preparation for both a beautiful death and eternal life to come.The frost, far from killing the plant, causes its organs to "develope hues still more brilliant, and make creation smile, though about to descend into her wintry grave." (98) And
He had lectured on Orra herself the previous year, after publishing A Woman of Amherst: The Travel Diaries of Orra White Hitchcock, 1847 and 1850. Next semester, the Mead Museum at Amherst College will mount a major exhibition, Orra White Hitchcock (1796–1863): An Amherst Woman of Art and Science, curated by Bob Herbert and former College Archivist Daria D'Arienzo.
Unfortunately, the historical landscape of the house of the Hitchcocks' scarcely less distinguished son, Edward, Jr., is under threat today as Amherst College proposes to remove an elegant 310-foot fence that frames the property. The decision of the Amherst Historical Commission to impose a twelve-month demolition delay has sparked controversy in some circles but is also serving as a useful opportunity to inform and engage the public on the subject of historic preservation.
Mary Loeffelholz outruns the evidence when she (following Richard Sewall) postulates that the Hitchcock volume about flowers that Emily Dickinson recalled reading every autumn as a child was the Religious Lectures. A careful consideration of both the subject matter and the publication date precludes that. Still, we do know that the book was in the Dickinson Homestead library, and in light of the poet's own views and works, as well as the connections between the two families, it is reasonable to assume that she had read and knew it. And certainly, like Hitchcock, she (though not without struggle) hoped for and believed in bodily resurrection.
I don't know about that, but like Dickinson, I do have faith that, even this year, as in others, autumn will arrive in its full glory and then:
Neither when I crossed the Connecticut River at Hadley via the Calvin Coolidge Memorial Bridge nor when I paused at the "scenic" overlook above Holyoke on the way back from the auto glass shop in West Springfield did I see much fall foliage. However, here in the uplands, signs of the change were more common. I noticed them on the dog's morning walk (in fact: spotted the first ones, below, on Labor Day weekend, which is the symbolic if not astronomical end of summer).
Oct. 4
Last week, I would have written that we were still ahead of the game (and the season), but when I retraced that same route along I-91 today, there was still far more green than red and orange to be seen, even at the overlook.
Now people are starting to worry. Just today, Springfield's Channel 22 quoted people in the hospitality trades expressing concern that the delayed leaf-peeping season was hurting tourism. The foliage is supposed to reach peak color just after the Columbus Day weekend.
Coincidentally, the Library of Congress today posted its list of readings on "The Nature & Science of Autumn."
It's ironic that this year's season is causing worries because Yankee Magazine recently named Amherst one of the top 25 foliage towns in autumn New England:
(1.) Kent, ConnecticutWhile we wait for the real thing, I thought I'd share some historical autumn imagery from one of our local nineteenth-century artists, Orra White Hitchcock (1798-1863). The wife of famed Amherst College President Edward Hitchcock (1793-1864), she produced images for some of his scientific and religious works (he was Professor of both Geology and Natural Theology) and was a distinguished cultural figure in her own right, in the words of the Amherst College archivists: "one of the earliest female artists and illustrators in a the U.S." When the Historical Subcommittee of the Amherst 250th Anniversary chose subjects for the re-enactors at the graves in West Cemetery, Orra rather than Edward was the Hitchcock whom they selected.
(2.) Bethel, Maine
(3.) Manchester, Vermont
(4.) Williamstown, Massachusetts
(5.) Middlebury, Vermont
(6.) Camden, Maine (tie)
(6.) Waitsfield, Vermont (tie)
(7.) Conway/North Conway, New Hampshire
(8.) Sandwich, New Hampshire
(9.) Rangeley, Maine
(10.) Blue Hill, Maine (tie)
(10.) Woodstock, Vermont (tie)
(10.) Waterville Valley, New Hampshire (tie)
(10.) Amherst, Massachusetts (tie)
(11.) Grafton, Vermont (tie)
(11.) East Haddam, Connecticut (tie)
(11.) Walpole, New Hampshire (tie)
(12.) The Cornwalls, Connecticut (tie)
(12.) Litchfield, Connecticut (tie)
(12.) Jackson, New Hampshire (tie)
(13.) Jeffersonville, Vermont (tie)
(13.) Shelburne Falls, Massachusetts (tie)
(13.) Montgomery, Vermont (tie)
(13.) Stowe, Vermont (tie)
(13.) Hanover, New Hampshire (tie)
This lithograph, "Autumnal Scenery, View in Amherst" (from the volume of plates for Edward Hitchcock's Geology of Massachusetts, 1833), depicts Amherst as seen from the east, in the Pelham Hills. Amherst College (Johnson Chapel; South, North, and Williston Halls) is at far left. What is perhaps most noteworthy about the scenery is the relative paucity of trees compared with the view that would greet the traveler today. Hitchcock painted the scene at the height of deforestation, by which time, as the Fisher Museum of Harvard Forest explains, "60 to 80 percent of the land was cleared for pasture, tillage, orchards and buildings. Small remaining areas of woodland were subjected to frequent cuttings for lumber and fuel."
Here, in her husband's Religious Lectures on Peculiar Phenomena in the Four Seasons. . . (Amherst: J. S. &. C. Adams, 1850), she depicted the "Autumnal Scenery" at the "Confluence of Connecticut and Deerfield Rivers," to the west.
For Edward Hitchcock, as the volume's title implies, nature was a book to be studied for its spiritual message. Opening his lecture on "The Euthanasia of Autumn" (probably not a title that we would choose today, though it just means: good death) with Isaiah's 'We all do fade as a leaf" (64:6), he finds that the season instructs: our bodily powers, beauty, and glory are fleeting. Accordingly, autumn ought to teach us piety, strength in adversity, and preparation for both a beautiful death and eternal life to come.The frost, far from killing the plant, causes its organs to "develope hues still more brilliant, and make creation smile, though about to descend into her wintry grave." (98) And
The gay splendor of our forests, as autumn comes on, may seem to some inappropriate, when we consider that it is the precursor of decay and death. But when we remember that the plant still lives, and after a season of inaction will awake to new and more vigorous life, and that the apparent decay is only laying aside a summer robe, because unfit for winter, is it not appropriate that nature should hang out signals of joy rather than of sorrow? Why should she not descend exultingly, and in her richest dress, into the grave, in hope of so early and so glorious a resurrection? (100)Thankfully, Orra White Hitchcock's legacy is being recovered. Last winter, in the context of the Amherst 250th and the Darwin 200th, Mount Holyoke Professor of Art History Emeritus Robert Herbert made mention of her work in a lecture on "Edward Hitchcock: Science and Religion in the Embrace of Nature," sponsored by the Emily Dickinson Museum.
![]() |
Robert Herbert lecture: art by Orra Hitchcock, March 2009 |
Unfortunately, the historical landscape of the house of the Hitchcocks' scarcely less distinguished son, Edward, Jr., is under threat today as Amherst College proposes to remove an elegant 310-foot fence that frames the property. The decision of the Amherst Historical Commission to impose a twelve-month demolition delay has sparked controversy in some circles but is also serving as a useful opportunity to inform and engage the public on the subject of historic preservation.
Mary Loeffelholz outruns the evidence when she (following Richard Sewall) postulates that the Hitchcock volume about flowers that Emily Dickinson recalled reading every autumn as a child was the Religious Lectures. A careful consideration of both the subject matter and the publication date precludes that. Still, we do know that the book was in the Dickinson Homestead library, and in light of the poet's own views and works, as well as the connections between the two families, it is reasonable to assume that she had read and knew it. And certainly, like Hitchcock, she (though not without struggle) hoped for and believed in bodily resurrection.
I don't know about that, but like Dickinson, I do have faith that, even this year, as in others, autumn will arrive in its full glory and then:
The morns are meeker than they were,
The nuts are getting brown;
The berry's cheek is plumper,
The rose is out of town.
The maple wears a gayer scarf,
The field a scarlet gown.
Lest I should be old-fashioned,
I'll put a trinket on.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Magazine: Kent, Conn. tops for leaf peeping (boston.com)
- Why Do Leaves Change Color in Fall? (thedailygreen.com)
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Amherst Historical Commission and the Demolition Delay: The Devil Incarnate, or Just Doing Its Duty?
proposed demolition of Clark (Hitchcock) house fence:
the devil's in the details
The editorial painted a frightening portrait of an out-of-control organization that “does not have a sense of proportion in exercising [its] power,” and, having “tested the boundaries of common sense,” is “overstepping its authority.”
The Nixon White House in 1972? The Bush war cabinet in 2002? No, Amherst local government in 2010.
It was only to be expected: Having boldly spoken out against the school system and Jones Library Board of Trustees, it was time for the editors of the Daily Hampshire Gazette and Amherst Bulletin to turn against the most dangerous body in town: the Historical Commission. Yep, we’re Satan’s legion.
The editorial was so ill-tempered and ill-informed that it was hard to know where to begin: with the lack of basic understanding of preservation philosophy and practices (much of the latter anchored in local, state, and federal law), or with the willful distortion of the context, which attempted to stir up controversy by tarring us with the brush of an anti-“development” ideology that had nothing to do with our decisions.
Since the piece appeared, other preservation issues have made the news here, as they have been doing elsewhere in the state: in North Andover and Salem, for instance. Back in Amherst, a couple of irate and misinformed residents took the editorial as an invitation to denounce our work toward creation of a local historic district ordinance, even though it is mandated by the town's new Master Plan.
The editorial really deserves a good fisking. As I’ve mentioned, I also have in mind a longer piece on the more general question of preservation policy and demolition delays. For now, I’ll just post the original piece and the various responses without commentary. The rest will follow in due time. These issues are not going away. I wish one could say the same about our historic structures.
The editorial [1]
In Our Opinion: For love of a fence
By Daily Hampshire Gazette
Created 08/27/2010 - 04:00
The Amherst Historical Commission tested the boundaries of common sense Monday when it ordered Amherst College to wait a year before it demolish an old wooden fence around one of its buildings.
Last month, the commission imposed a similar delay on demolition of a century-old barn in North Amherst that is leaning to one side and is at risk of collapse. With more owners of old structures applying for demolition permits, the commission needs to be realistic about what should be preserved and use its power to order delays more judiciously.
The commission seems to be overstepping its authority in the case of the Amherst College fence. This is the first instance of the commission ordering a delay in demolishing anything other than a building. And while the purpose of the bylaw giving the commission this power is to provide an opportunity to preserve a structure, Amherst College has made it clear it has no intention to do anything other than demolish the fence.
So why did the commission order the delay?
Chairman James Wald said it was a matter of principle, noting, "We're making a statement that preservation is important." Another commission member called it "a handsome, handsome fence." We think that when a public board has the power to stop a private property owner from doing what he wants, it needs a better reason than that.
Amherst College does not need to be told historic preservation is important. It is spending about $14 million to renovate the Lord Jeffery Inn, and has spent about $5 million since 2002 on the Emily Dickinson Museum. It has also undertaken the expensive renovation of the 1790 house on the corner of South Pleasant Street and Hitchcock Road.
The fence in question is about 80 years old and is rotting in several places. It is not representative of the era in which it was built, because at the time it was intended to look older. The college plowed a lot of money into it 10 years ago and it needs more attention. Now that the commission has declared it to be "historically significant," it will continue to deteriorate over the next year.
The maintenance costs are not the only reason the college wants to remove the fence. It believes that college buildings should be integrated into downtown and wants to remove overgrown vegetation between the fence and the building, which is used for offices and classrooms. The college views the fence as a vestige of the time before 1966, when it was a private residence.
The college has offered to dismantle the fence and find ways to reuse it elsewhere.
The bylaw giving the commission this power says that if it is clear that there is no possibility that a building will be salvaged, it can recommend issuing a demolition permit.
We think that's what it should have done in this case.
Amherst's demolition delay bylaw can have a useful public purpose in encouraging the preservation of historic buildings that contribute to the town's cultural heritage. But if the commission does not have a sense of proportion in exercising this power, it is merely promoting the notion that Amherst is hostile to business without achieving anything in terms of historic preservation.
* * *
The Responses [2]Protecting history a must
By LOUIS S. GREENBAUM
Published on September 10, 2010
Regarding your editorial "Historically significant fence continues to decay" (Bulletin, Sept. 3), your attack on the decision of the Amherst Historical Commission to save a historical fence in the town center and a barn vitally linked to the history of the street railway of the Amherst region is misguided. Your assertion that somehow this is proof that "Amherst is hostile to business" is laughable!
Anyone with an appreciation of historical architecture knows that since the time of the Renaissance buildings and fences were inextricably linked -- the latter meant to enhance or complete the spatial aesthetic. Bernini's colonnade of St. Peters is perhaps the most dramatic example. All over America in the Georgian and Federal periods ornate fences meant to frame the design of the building were commonplace. (The fences of architect Samuel McIntyre of Salem were widely copied.)
The earlier owner of the Amherst fence in question, obviously influenced by the Colonial Revival, correctly believed that his fence was appropriate to the classicism of the building.
Far from the Historical Commission "overstepping its authority," it judiciously and responsibly executed its statutory obligation to protect Amherst's historical assets and monuments. During the past three years the Commission has granted innumerable requests for demolition to properties of little or no historical import. Was the Commission's refusal several years back to approve the demolition of the brick Federal mansion at 575 North East Street the right thing to do?
That decision -- enthusiastically received by Amherst townspeople -- appears to be in conflict with what the Bulletin laments -- "to stop a private owner from doing what he wants."
Unfortunately Massachusetts law limits the rights of the Historical Commission to a one-year reprieve during which Amherst College and the owners' of the North Amherst trolley barn might have time to reflect that ownership of historical properties carries the responsibility for their maintenance. Both barn and fence are restorable. The Commission found no structural engineer who agreed with the owner's warning of the barn's imminent collapse. Nor does investing millions for the expansion of the Lord Jeff Inn count as spending for historical preservation.
Owners have no moral right to degrade, and, yes, even to demolish historical property of value to the community because they are unwilling to pay the cost of maintenance or choose a more lucrative use of the land. In that sense Jim Wald and his colleagues of the Historical Commission are absolutely right in advocating preservation for the common good.
At no time in Amherst's history has preservation been more important. Amherst citizens are reminded every day of the possible demolition of not merely buildings but of whole neighborhoods for the sacred cause of economic development -- the Patterson fields, Gateway project, Atkins and North Amherst Village Centers and widespread rezoning to attract business.
Many citizens have already spoken out to defend the integrity of our neighborhoods and the way of life that old barns and fences symbolize the beauty, charm and continuity of community culture, and a shared respect for public artifacts that should not be ravaged for the sake of the Almighty Buck!
Louis S. Greenbaum of Amherst is a former member of the Historical Commission.
* * *
Letter: Dickinson Museum raises all its own funds
Published on September 17, 2010
To the Bulletin: An editorial in the Gazette (Aug. 27) and Bulletin (Sept. 3) concerning historic preservation stated incorrectly that Amherst College has provided $5 million to the Emily Dickinson Museum since 2002. Although the Museum is owned by the Trustees of Amherst College, it is overseen by a separate Board of Governors and, by formal memorandum of understanding, charged with raising its own operating and capital funds.
Since its creation in 2003 the Emily Dickinson Museum has taken this responsibility very seriously, and has earned or raised independently of the College most of the funds needed for its operations and restoration projects. For example, the recent restoration of the hemlock hedge and decorative fence fronting the Homestead and Evergreens was funded entirely by private contributions raised specifically for that purpose.
Amherst College is an encouraging parent to the Emily Dickinson Museum and does much to enhance its standing as one of the world's most significant literary landmarks. However, the site of Emily Dickinson's poetic genius thrives because of the generous support of friends in the local community and around the world. We hope to count on their continued support.
Jane Wald
Executive Director
Emily Dickinson Museum
* * *
Panel is acting prudently
By JAMES WALD
Published on September 24, 2010
Members of the Historical Commission were dismayed to find their actions caricatured in your recent editorials. You charge us with "test[ing] the boundaries of common sense" and "overstepping [our] authority" in imposing demolition delays on a barn and a fence. The baseless accusations rest on a misunderstanding of both our official role and the two cases.
Under Massachusetts General Law (Ch. 40 ᄃ 8D) historical commissions are responsible for protecting local historic and archaeological resources. Article 13 of the Amherst Zoning Bylaw, which -- following established state and national policies -- allows us to impose a delay on destruction of such resources, is the only real preventative tool. As I make clear at each hearing, we take the interests of property owners seriously and, even when we find a structure historically significant, we impose delays with equal seriousness: which is to say: rarely, and in hopes of finding a mutually satisfactory solution.
If the "century-old barn in North Amherst" were indeed "at risk of collapse," we would have voted for immediate demolition, as we did in another case earlier this month. The commission imposed a delay for the simple reason that this may be the unique surviving example of a wooden trolley-car barn -- reflecting a crucial phase in our economic and technological history -- in the commonwealth. The Cowls Company had no plans for immediate new construction and the delay sensibly allows time for further research and consultation with parties interested in restoring or relocating the structure.
You also chide us for the unprecedented application of the bylaw to an "old wooden fence" and mock a commissioner's description of it as "handsome." The U.S. government has long listed fences as key features that contribute to the integrity of historic structures and cultural landscapes (see the 2004 Dept. of the Interior handbook). Aesthetic value is moreover a legitimate criterion affirmed by federal court decision and enshrined in our own Demolition Delay Bylaw.
You further complain that the 80-year-old fence "is not representative of the era in which it was built because at the time it was intended to look older." The same could be said of the house itself as it now appears. In the 1930s, the owners remodeled this fine Italianate structure by famed architect William Fenno Pratt (who also designed Austin Dickinson's "Evergreens" and the two Hills mansions on Main Street) in the Greek Revival style of a century earlier. The imposing 310-foot fence erected at that time was an integral aesthetic and historical element, one on which the builders clearly lavished particular attention. It is perhaps the only example of such in town, a more complex and elegant cousin of the one in the North Amherst Cemetery.
In imposing a delay, we both affirmed our role as guardians of the public interest and sought time in which to forge a compromise with Amherst College, with whom we have always had a congenial and productive working relationship.
In both cases, then, the commission exercised its authority legally and prudently. What is most regrettable is that you chose to portray our decisions as emblematic of some anti-business and anti-development ideology. They were no such thing. The government offices and citizen bodies trusted with protecting our historic, environmental, and agricultural resources work hard and responsibly to balance the public and private interest. As the chair of the Comprehensive Planning Committee, I was proud our diverse membership was able to forge a consensus on the future direction of the town. Facile judgments such as yours divide us just when we should instead be uniting to address the real crisis of economy and resources that we all face.
James Wald is the chairman of the Amherst Historical Commission.
* * *
And, finally, there was this piece by frequent commentator Richard Bogartz.
A Sideways Glance: Preserve the fence, but let it rotIn the end, he comes around to supporting us, . . . er, sort of. Because I have no idea what he is really trying to say (confusing the Historical Commission with the Historical Society doesn't help) I'll let you struggle with the rest yourselves, if you are so inclined. I think he was trying to be philosophical and humorous at once, or something of the sort. Dunno, though Immanuel Kant never tried to pull that off.
By RICHARD S. BOGARTZ
Published on October 01, 2010
Some advocate historic preservation. Anything old should be saved, they say. That way we preserve the tokens of our culture and so we better know who we are by knowing who we were.
Lately it has even been claimed that preservation promotes sustainable development which benefits the environment. The argument goes that the reuse of buildings successfully reduces pollution and promotes the conservation of nature. (For more, put "Renovating vs. Building New: The Environmental Merits" in a Google search.)
I never got it. In my view the rotting and decaying of old buildings was just an instance of the general rule that changeables change. Other familiar instances are that breakables break, ageables age, spoilables spoil, stainables stain.
The world is constantly subject to change. So buildings get old and fall down. What's the big deal? You put up new ones, fully knowing that they will fall down in their time. (full article)
* * *
The fence was one of the stops on the tour that I led as part of the lecture series that my colleague Max Page organized in conjunction with the new historic preservation initiative in the architecture and design program at the University of Massachusetts.
![]() |
Students from Max Page's UMass graduate course on public history and historic preservation examine the notorious fence. |
* * *
[1] The version published in the Bulletin was entitled, "'Historically significant' fence continues to decay."
[2] The titles of the responses are the creations of the paper's editors, not the authors.
Friday, October 8, 2010
Breaking News: Jones Library Director Bonnie Isman Retiring
Amherst Town Manager John Musante this afternoon informed the Select Board that longtime Jones Library Director Bonnie Isman—whose strained relations with some members of her board of trustees had recently been in the news—announced her retirement as of December 10.
No details yet.
No details yet.
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Historical Commission Tuesday Night Update
On Tuesday night, the Historical Commission took up several pieces of significant business, most associated with Community Preservation Act appropriations:
• It heard a report from consultant Martha Lyon after which it formally authorized the start of the bid process, in accordance with her recommendations, for restoration of historic nineteenth-century ironwork in West Cemetery: the ornamental fencing around the Dickinson and Cutler plots, as well as the Town Tomb door.
• It authorized applying for newly available state matching funds for a survey of historic outbuildings.
• In the lengthiest discussion of the evening, it took up the demolition delay requests for historic structures on the Hawthorne property (235 East Pleasant Street), acquired by the town at spring Town Meeting for potential use as recreation and affordable housing. The Commission found both the Greek Revival farmhouse (c. 1790-1830) and the two barns (one, late nineteenth century, and one, circa mid-twentieth century) to possess historical importance—the house, in 4 categories, the older barn, in 3, and the newer horse barn, in 1—under the terms of our Demolition Delay Bylaw. However, given the late hour and departure of two Commission members, it tabled a decision on the demolition request until the start of its next meeting on October 19.
• Finally, the Commission reviewed relevant portions of the zoning measures proposed as replacements for the town's old Phased Growth Bylaw, which will appear on the fall Town Meeting warrant.
Details will follow soon.
• It heard a report from consultant Martha Lyon after which it formally authorized the start of the bid process, in accordance with her recommendations, for restoration of historic nineteenth-century ironwork in West Cemetery: the ornamental fencing around the Dickinson and Cutler plots, as well as the Town Tomb door.
• It authorized applying for newly available state matching funds for a survey of historic outbuildings.
• In the lengthiest discussion of the evening, it took up the demolition delay requests for historic structures on the Hawthorne property (235 East Pleasant Street), acquired by the town at spring Town Meeting for potential use as recreation and affordable housing. The Commission found both the Greek Revival farmhouse (c. 1790-1830) and the two barns (one, late nineteenth century, and one, circa mid-twentieth century) to possess historical importance—the house, in 4 categories, the older barn, in 3, and the newer horse barn, in 1—under the terms of our Demolition Delay Bylaw. However, given the late hour and departure of two Commission members, it tabled a decision on the demolition request until the start of its next meeting on October 19.
• Finally, the Commission reviewed relevant portions of the zoning measures proposed as replacements for the town's old Phased Growth Bylaw, which will appear on the fall Town Meeting warrant.
Details will follow soon.
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Sunday Morning Salmon Station (touch of evil or tranquility bay?)
I always like to walk the dog down Plumtree Road, which runs from Amherst down to Sunderland. It's a pleasant rural walk on a quiet, partially unpaved route bordered by forest. One is sure to hear a rooster or two on the way or on the road, and every once in a while, one encounters a group of wild turkeys instead of a jogger or bicyclist. (One of the latter wheeled by yesterday, remarking, "Giant dog!")
To be sure, new houses came in here in recent years, and I regretted the loss of the "rural" setting, but this supposedly unspoiled landscape was of course the product of repeated human intervention (these are secondary forests that took over old farms) and our home is a former farmhouse. At some point, someone perhaps complained when it went up. There's more than enough NIMBY-ism around here, and humility and restraint are the proper response.
At any rate, I also particularly enjoy the road because it brings me into contact with aspects of the real world that we don't usually see in our little college town. At one point on the north side of the road is the heavy-equipment training site for the labor union of Operating Engineers, and across from it to the south is the office of the Connecticut River Resource Management Complex, whose responsibilities include ensuring the welfare of migratory fish populations in the Connecticut River Basin. Both offices perhaps deal with endangered species.
A bit farther west is one of the most interesting and idyllic spots: the Richard Cronin National Salmon Station.
Most of the work takes place inside the buildings beyond secured chain-link fences, but there is also a popular public viewing area, which one reaches after walking past an idyllic little pond.
Subdued—slightly rubbed—yellow salmon stencils on the asphalt path point the way; the worn paint and softened colors match the quiet setting.
In the long, shallow, cement tanks, one can observe—sometimes with just a bit of extra effort, depending on the reflection on the water's surface—the salmon.
Here and there, one spots a smaller, strangely dark, even blackish fish, and is taken aback.
Whether for this reason or others, urban (or is it: rural?) legends have sprung up around the site. According to the most popular one, the salmon were brought here in hopes of breeding a superior fish, but as a result of some secret experiment gone horribly awry, can never safely be released into the natural environment. Either because it would be inhumane to kill them or because the scientists are still attempting to figure out what went wrong, the poor piscine creatures are condemned to live out their lives in the confines of the long concrete holding tanks.
Whether the slicker-coated scarecrow adds a touch of the sinister or the humorous is a question of opinion and individual psychology,
but happening upon small mammalian remains farther down the path, right at the edge of the shallower tanks lush in wild vegetation and devoid of fish (save for the isolated and ghostly white remains of an unfortunate comrade) can, under the right circumstances, introduce a hint of inexplicable menace.
Can legends of monster fish arise for no reason?
The truth, of course, is far more mundane.
We are concerned here with anadromous fish, which "are born in fresh water, migrate to the ocean to grow into adults, and then return to fresh water to spawn." The Connecticut River Resource Management Office is tasked with protecting and enhancing the resources and biodiversity of the river's watershed.
One tantalizing philosophical question: To what extent is transformation of an animal through genetic engineering qualitatively different from the manipulation that we have undertaken for centuries (and in some cases, millennia) through selective breeding? The dog is a case in point. With over 400 recognized breeds, it is, as one PBS science documentary put it, the most varied animal on the planet. Unfortunately, that deliberate diversity comes at a cruel price, as any dog lover or responsible dog breeder or trainer can tell you. In the first place, there is the biological dimension, when dogs are doomed to suffer physical pain as a result of inbreeding and other poor practices. The prevalence of hip dysplasia in German Shepherds is but the most familiar example. In the second place, there is the social dimension. "Before the Victorians invited the dog into our home," as that documentary explained, dogs were bred for specialized purposes. Trying to make domestic pets out of creatures with genetic traits developed for completely different circumstances can be a recipe for disaster. As one dog expert observed, our longstanding symbiotic relationship with the species is “in crisis” because
“we have completely forgotten” what this animal was intended to do.
Clearly, the issues are complex and multilayered. Sadly, much of the discussion of genetic modifications is ill-informed.
Large sectors of the European and American public have become downright paranoid about Genetically Modified Organisms [GMO's] in the food supply, which they histrionically denounce as "Frankenfoods." In the meantime, as I've noted, Europeans, while overwhelmingly rejecting traditional theological beliefs, evince a peculiar faith in homeopathy, an unscientific superstition if ever there was one. (It's not immediately obvious why the idea of a transcendent Creator is intrinsically more preposterous than a chemical theory that ignores the consequences of Avogadro's Number.)
There is a debate to be had, but it needs to be a serious and scientific one.
Organic farmers recently won a landmark legal battle when they secured a ban on the genetically modified sugar beet on the grounds that its prevalence (95 percent of the US crop) deprived them of freedom of choice (not enough conventional seed available, plus the danger that cross-pollination from neighboring fields would contaminate their crop and deprive them of their organic certification). A true evaluation of genetically modified organisms, as a recent UN study on African agriculture likewise showed, needs to take into account the full panoply of factors and consequences: technological, biological, economic, ecological, and ethical, on both the local and wider scales.
On the less serious side of the newsroom at NPR, the folks at "Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me," noting the rise of strange animal hybrids and the amusing task of creating the appropriate names—a cross between a zebra and a horse is called a "zorse"—have some fun with the idea. Thus, for example, by that naming convention, a cross between a beagle and an eagle would be a grotesque (and impossible) creature, but called: a beagle. The examples get worse.
Fiction is still stranger than truth. But that may change.
To be sure, new houses came in here in recent years, and I regretted the loss of the "rural" setting, but this supposedly unspoiled landscape was of course the product of repeated human intervention (these are secondary forests that took over old farms) and our home is a former farmhouse. At some point, someone perhaps complained when it went up. There's more than enough NIMBY-ism around here, and humility and restraint are the proper response.
At any rate, I also particularly enjoy the road because it brings me into contact with aspects of the real world that we don't usually see in our little college town. At one point on the north side of the road is the heavy-equipment training site for the labor union of Operating Engineers, and across from it to the south is the office of the Connecticut River Resource Management Complex, whose responsibilities include ensuring the welfare of migratory fish populations in the Connecticut River Basin. Both offices perhaps deal with endangered species.
A bit farther west is one of the most interesting and idyllic spots: the Richard Cronin National Salmon Station.
![]() |
fish trucks at rest over Labor Day weekend |
Subdued—slightly rubbed—yellow salmon stencils on the asphalt path point the way; the worn paint and softened colors match the quiet setting.
![]() |
Fish Tracks |
In the long, shallow, cement tanks, one can observe—sometimes with just a bit of extra effort, depending on the reflection on the water's surface—the salmon.
Here and there, one spots a smaller, strangely dark, even blackish fish, and is taken aback.
Whether for this reason or others, urban (or is it: rural?) legends have sprung up around the site. According to the most popular one, the salmon were brought here in hopes of breeding a superior fish, but as a result of some secret experiment gone horribly awry, can never safely be released into the natural environment. Either because it would be inhumane to kill them or because the scientists are still attempting to figure out what went wrong, the poor piscine creatures are condemned to live out their lives in the confines of the long concrete holding tanks.
Whether the slicker-coated scarecrow adds a touch of the sinister or the humorous is a question of opinion and individual psychology,
but happening upon small mammalian remains farther down the path, right at the edge of the shallower tanks lush in wild vegetation and devoid of fish (save for the isolated and ghostly white remains of an unfortunate comrade) can, under the right circumstances, introduce a hint of inexplicable menace.
Can legends of monster fish arise for no reason?
The truth, of course, is far more mundane.
We are concerned here with anadromous fish, which "are born in fresh water, migrate to the ocean to grow into adults, and then return to fresh water to spawn." The Connecticut River Resource Management Office is tasked with protecting and enhancing the resources and biodiversity of the river's watershed.
Staff and volunteers of the Richard Cronin National Salmon Station have the unique responsibility of capturing and retrieving the Connecticut River’s returning adult Atlantic salmon. Every spring, the wild fish are trucked from the river and its tributaries to the hatchery where they are held safely through summer. In the fall, these fish are mated using techniques that maximize genetic diversity. The eggs are incubated on site and then distributed to other state and federal hatcheries throughout the watershed as part of the Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Program Restoration Program.Fortuitously, my recent weekend peregrinations come at a time when salmon and scientific experiments have been much in the news. As NPR explained in a recent very thorough piece, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is in the process of reviewing the first request to permit genetically modified animals for human consumption. A company called AquaBounty Technologies has developed a technique that, by adding a growth hormone from a Chinook salmon and a genetic switch from another species of fish, allows Atlantic salmon to grow roughly twice as fast—and thus be "harvested" in roughly half the time—as usual. There are really three possible basic concerns here. It s still hard to see how consumption of the fish would constitute a hazard to human health. We are told that the prevalence of fish allergies argues for caution. Fair enough, but if one is already allergic and aware of that fact, what new risk would this pose? The issue seems to come down to the ambiguity of evidence or inconsistency of test methods and data presentation. (Part of the problem is that the FDA's standards and procedures have not kept up with the science itself; among other things, the fish is regulated as a drug.). More serious, one would think, is the possibility of unforeseen environmental harm if fish escape and interbreed with natural stocks or otherwise alter the environment. Aquabounty says the latter cannot happen because the eggs will all be female and sterile, and the fish raised on land rather than in ocean pens. The generally admirable Union for Concerned Scientists rejected that assurance with an expression of general skepticism regarding supposedly redundant safety systems, but its argument was not made more persuasive by the fact that it referenced the BP oil spill (something of a cheap shot as well as irrelevant) rather than directly addressing an entirely different system with both physical and biological elements. This is not to say that concerns are not justified; just that this was a feeble riposte. Most generally, of course, there is the ethical concern that should attach to any genetic modification of a sentient creature, especially when undertaken in order to provide human food. One would think that should be the starting point for any deliberation.
One tantalizing philosophical question: To what extent is transformation of an animal through genetic engineering qualitatively different from the manipulation that we have undertaken for centuries (and in some cases, millennia) through selective breeding? The dog is a case in point. With over 400 recognized breeds, it is, as one PBS science documentary put it, the most varied animal on the planet. Unfortunately, that deliberate diversity comes at a cruel price, as any dog lover or responsible dog breeder or trainer can tell you. In the first place, there is the biological dimension, when dogs are doomed to suffer physical pain as a result of inbreeding and other poor practices. The prevalence of hip dysplasia in German Shepherds is but the most familiar example. In the second place, there is the social dimension. "Before the Victorians invited the dog into our home," as that documentary explained, dogs were bred for specialized purposes. Trying to make domestic pets out of creatures with genetic traits developed for completely different circumstances can be a recipe for disaster. As one dog expert observed, our longstanding symbiotic relationship with the species is “in crisis” because
“we have completely forgotten” what this animal was intended to do.
Clearly, the issues are complex and multilayered. Sadly, much of the discussion of genetic modifications is ill-informed.
Large sectors of the European and American public have become downright paranoid about Genetically Modified Organisms [GMO's] in the food supply, which they histrionically denounce as "Frankenfoods." In the meantime, as I've noted, Europeans, while overwhelmingly rejecting traditional theological beliefs, evince a peculiar faith in homeopathy, an unscientific superstition if ever there was one. (It's not immediately obvious why the idea of a transcendent Creator is intrinsically more preposterous than a chemical theory that ignores the consequences of Avogadro's Number.)
There is a debate to be had, but it needs to be a serious and scientific one.
Organic farmers recently won a landmark legal battle when they secured a ban on the genetically modified sugar beet on the grounds that its prevalence (95 percent of the US crop) deprived them of freedom of choice (not enough conventional seed available, plus the danger that cross-pollination from neighboring fields would contaminate their crop and deprive them of their organic certification). A true evaluation of genetically modified organisms, as a recent UN study on African agriculture likewise showed, needs to take into account the full panoply of factors and consequences: technological, biological, economic, ecological, and ethical, on both the local and wider scales.
On the less serious side of the newsroom at NPR, the folks at "Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me," noting the rise of strange animal hybrids and the amusing task of creating the appropriate names—a cross between a zebra and a horse is called a "zorse"—have some fun with the idea. Thus, for example, by that naming convention, a cross between a beagle and an eagle would be a grotesque (and impossible) creature, but called: a beagle. The examples get worse.
Fiction is still stranger than truth. But that may change.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Help students learn about salmon migration (theolympian.com)
- Why Genetically Engineered Salmon Will Benefit Its Biotech Creators - And ... - BNET (blog) (news.google.com)
- Frakenfish: Genetically Engineered Salmon, Would You Eat It? (nowpublic.com)
- Panel Advises More Aggressive FDA Analysis of Engineered Salmon (nytimes.com)
- FDA Committee Punts on Question of Biotech Fish - Discover Magazine (blog) (news.google.com)
- Robyn O'Brien: FDA Says Science Around New Salmon Is Unsatisfactory (huffingtonpost.com)
- Genetically Modified Salmon: The FDA's Fish Fight Over Labeling (dailyfinance.com)
Friday, September 24, 2010
New Lecture Series: Priceless: New Approaches to Historic Preservation in the 21st Century
Great series historic preservation lectures to begin today; about to head off to the first of them.
Diane Lederman of the Republican provided a schedule of events, as well as this introduction:
Here is the text of the announcement from UMass:
A Lecture Series of the new Historic Preservation Initiative in the Architecture + Design Program and the College of Humanities and Fine Arts
All lectures (except for Jim Wald and Michael Arad) take place at 4 pm in Herter Hall, Room 231 on the University of Massachusetts Amherst campus.
Liz Ševčenko is founding Director of the International Coalition of Sites of Conscience, a network of historic sites that foster public dialogue on pressing human rights and social justice issues. She works with initiatives in more than forty countries to design programs and practices that reflect on past struggles and inspire public involvement in addressing their contemporary legacies.
Michael Arad is a partner at Handel Architects LLP. His design for the World Trade Center Site Memorial, "Reflecting Absence," was chosen by the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation in January 2004. Prior to winning the Memorial competition, Mr. Arad worked as an architect for the New York City Housing Authority and for Kohn Pedersen Fox, where he worked on several major projects, including Union Station Tower, a mixed-use 108-story skyscraper in Hong Kong, and Espirito Santo Plaza, a 37-story tower in Miami that won the AIA New York Chapter Design Award Citation in 2001.
Co-sponsored by the Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning and the Dartmouth Club of the Pioneer Valley.
Note: This talk is in Hills North, room 105 at 4 pm.
Jim Wald is a professor at Hampshire College, Director of the Hampshire College Center for the Book, member of the Amherst Board of Selectmen, and Chair of the Historical Commission for the Town of Amherst.
Note: This will be a walking tour, leaving from the Amherst Town Hall, 4 Boltwood Avenue at 1 pm.
Daniel Bluestone is Associate Professor and Director of the Historic Preservation Program at the University of Virginia. He is the author of Buildings, Landscapes, and Memory: Case Studies in Historic Preservation (2011), and Constructing Chicago. He has also led several award-winning efforts to preserve significant historic sites in Chicago and Charlottesville.
Gerald Frug Gerald Frug is the Louis D. Brandeis Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. He served as a Special Assistant to the Chairman of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and as Administrator of the Health Services Administration of the City of New York. He is the author of dozens of articles and book chapters on local government, as well as of Local Government Law (2010, with Richard Ford and David Barron), City Bound: How States Stifle Urban Innovation (2008, with David Barron), and City Making: Building Communities without Building Walls (1999).
Sergio Kiernan is the Architecture Editor of Página 12, the foremost investigative paper in Argentina, and the author of Classical and Vernacular: The Architecture of Alejandro Moreno” and SYASA 20 Years, about the restoration of the Teatro Colon in Buenos Aires.
Richard Todd has spent many years as a magazine and book editor at The Atlantic Monthly, The New England Monthly, Worth, Civilization, and Houghton Mifflin. He has written scores of articles on a wide range of cultural themes for Harper’s, The Atlantic Monthly, The New York Times Magazine, Condé Nast Traveler, and the Columbia
Journalism Review, among others. He is a professor at Goucher College and author most recently of The Thing Itself: On the Search for Authenticity.
David Fixler is a principal of design and preservation at Einhorn Yaffee Prescott AE/PC in Boston, President of DOCOMOMO-US/New England, the international organization dedicated to preserving and documenting the modern movement, and author of numerous articles on the preservation of modern architecture. He recently led a team that completed a major preservation planning report for the University of Massachusetts Amherst campus.
The series is made possible with the support of the Dean of the College of Humanities and Fine Arts, the Dean of the Graduate School, the Department of Art, Architecture, and Art History, the Department of History, the Department of Political Science, the Legal Studies Program, the Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, the Dartmouth Club of Pioneer Valley, and Hancock Shaker Village.
For more information, please contact Max Page, Professor of Architecture and History, and Director of Historic Preservation Initiatives for the College of Humanities and Fine Arts, at mpage@art.umass.edu, and visit our website at http://umass.edu/architecture.
Diane Lederman of the Republican provided a schedule of events, as well as this introduction:
AMHERST - A talk by the designer of the World Trade Center Site Memorial will highlight a series of lectures this fall at the University of Massachusetts on current architectural issues.
Called “Priceless: New Approaches to Historic Preservation in the 21st Century,” the series is free and open to the public. All talks begin at 4 p.m.
The new series ties into a new preservation initiative at the university, said Max Page, the director of historic preservation initiatives for the College of Humanities and Fine Arts.
The university is now offering a Master of Science in Design and Historic Preservation.
The series is intended for everyone. “Preservation is the way most people interact with the past,” Page said. (read the rest)
Here is the text of the announcement from UMass:
Priceless: New Approaches to Historic Preservation in the 21st Century
A Lecture Series of the new Historic Preservation Initiative in the Architecture + Design Program and the College of Humanities and Fine Arts
All lectures (except for Jim Wald and Michael Arad) take place at 4 pm in Herter Hall, Room 231 on the University of Massachusetts Amherst campus.
September 24 Liz Ševčenko, “Sites of Conscience: Historic Preservation for Human Rights”
Liz Ševčenko is founding Director of the International Coalition of Sites of Conscience, a network of historic sites that foster public dialogue on pressing human rights and social justice issues. She works with initiatives in more than forty countries to design programs and practices that reflect on past struggles and inspire public involvement in addressing their contemporary legacies.
September 30 Michael Arad, “Reflecting Absence: Designing the National September 11th Memorial”
Michael Arad is a partner at Handel Architects LLP. His design for the World Trade Center Site Memorial, "Reflecting Absence," was chosen by the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation in January 2004. Prior to winning the Memorial competition, Mr. Arad worked as an architect for the New York City Housing Authority and for Kohn Pedersen Fox, where he worked on several major projects, including Union Station Tower, a mixed-use 108-story skyscraper in Hong Kong, and Espirito Santo Plaza, a 37-story tower in Miami that won the AIA New York Chapter Design Award Citation in 2001.
Co-sponsored by the Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning and the Dartmouth Club of the Pioneer Valley.
Note: This talk is in Hills North, room 105 at 4 pm.
October 1 Jim Wald, “The Politics and Practice of Preservation in Amherst”
Jim Wald is a professor at Hampshire College, Director of the Hampshire College Center for the Book, member of the Amherst Board of Selectmen, and Chair of the Historical Commission for the Town of Amherst.
Note: This will be a walking tour, leaving from the Amherst Town Hall, 4 Boltwood Avenue at 1 pm.
October 15 Daniel Bluestone, “Forming Attachments: The Building and Preservation of Belmead (1845-2010)”
Daniel Bluestone is Associate Professor and Director of the Historic Preservation Program at the University of Virginia. He is the author of Buildings, Landscapes, and Memory: Case Studies in Historic Preservation (2011), and Constructing Chicago. He has also led several award-winning efforts to preserve significant historic sites in Chicago and Charlottesville.
October 27 Gerald Frug, “The Architecture of Governance”
Gerald Frug Gerald Frug is the Louis D. Brandeis Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. He served as a Special Assistant to the Chairman of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and as Administrator of the Health Services Administration of the City of New York. He is the author of dozens of articles and book chapters on local government, as well as of Local Government Law (2010, with Richard Ford and David Barron), City Bound: How States Stifle Urban Innovation (2008, with David Barron), and City Making: Building Communities without Building Walls (1999).
October 29 Sergio Kiernan “The Battle for Preservation in Buenos Aires”
Sergio Kiernan is the Architecture Editor of Página 12, the foremost investigative paper in Argentina, and the author of Classical and Vernacular: The Architecture of Alejandro Moreno” and SYASA 20 Years, about the restoration of the Teatro Colon in Buenos Aires.
November 12 Richard Todd, “Preserving Appearances: On Artifice and Authenticity”
Richard Todd has spent many years as a magazine and book editor at The Atlantic Monthly, The New England Monthly, Worth, Civilization, and Houghton Mifflin. He has written scores of articles on a wide range of cultural themes for Harper’s, The Atlantic Monthly, The New York Times Magazine, Condé Nast Traveler, and the Columbia
Journalism Review, among others. He is a professor at Goucher College and author most recently of The Thing Itself: On the Search for Authenticity.
November 19 David Fixler, “Preserving the Modern: Case Studies from Massachusetts”
David Fixler is a principal of design and preservation at Einhorn Yaffee Prescott AE/PC in Boston, President of DOCOMOMO-US/New England, the international organization dedicated to preserving and documenting the modern movement, and author of numerous articles on the preservation of modern architecture. He recently led a team that completed a major preservation planning report for the University of Massachusetts Amherst campus.
The series is made possible with the support of the Dean of the College of Humanities and Fine Arts, the Dean of the Graduate School, the Department of Art, Architecture, and Art History, the Department of History, the Department of Political Science, the Legal Studies Program, the Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, the Dartmouth Club of Pioneer Valley, and Hancock Shaker Village.
For more information, please contact Max Page, Professor of Architecture and History, and Director of Historic Preservation Initiatives for the College of Humanities and Fine Arts, at mpage@art.umass.edu, and visit our website at http://umass.edu/architecture.
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Tuesday Night Brief: Historical Commission Completes Hearing on Hawthorne Farm; Tables Deliberation Till Next Meeting
A few days ago, the Gazette reported on debates over demolition or reuse of an old farmhouse on property the town of Amherst had purchased for affordable housing and recreation, to which I also alluded in my last piece. The town had researched the structure and presented reports suggesting that adaptive reuse was impractical and prohibitively expensive, for which reason it was requesting demolition (which could entail moving rather than demolishing the house: under the law, the former technically constitutes demolition, as well).
The demolition delay meeting last night was a very long one, due to the extensive public comment from the audience: mainly abutters, but also some members and former members of the Community Preservation Act Committee, under whose auspices the town had purchased the property. The comment was overwhelmingly in favor of saving the house. Some speakers questioned the calculations and reasoning of town staff. Given the late hour, the Commission decided to complete the public hearing and take up deliberation on the official historical significance of the structure at its next meeting on October 5. Stay tuned.
Here, the backgrounder from the recent Gazette:
![]() |
the public--and the applicant, Director of Conservation and Development David Ziomek (in white shirt) in the Town Room last night |
* * *
Here, the backgrounder from the recent Gazette:
Amherst Historical Commission to weigh demolition of 1850s farmhouse on East Pleasant Street
By SCOTT MERZBACH
Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
AMHERST - A Greek Revival farmhouse that has been a fixture along East Pleasant Street for more than 150 years could be torn down in the coming weeks.
The Historical Commission Tuesday will hold a demolition delay hearing on the request to remove the 1850s farmhouse, as well as two barns, from the streetscape at 235 East Pleasant St.
The hearing begins at 7:30 p.m. at Town Hall.
Because Amherst acquired the property from the Hawthorne family this year, the town's own Conservation and Development Office has filed the request for the demolition permit.
Town Manager Larry Shaffer said tours of the home indicate there is little salvageable and that the sooner the home is demolished, the sooner the town can begin preparations for constructing what he calls new "workforce housing" on the site. This would be aimed at people whose earnings are below the area median salaries.
There is no timetable for building this housing, though, as the town needs to find an agency with which to partner.
The town purchased the property primarily because of its proximity to the Wildwood School, which makes it an ideal place for constructing new playing fields. A secondary consideration was the possibility of affordable or low-income housing.
Shaffer said it is unrealistic to use the home just as a rental. "The town didn't buy the property to be landlords," Shaffer said.
His concern is the maintenance cost, and the longer the farmhouse remains standing, the more it will deteriorate, causing blight and becoming an attractive place for squatters.
Until new housing and the playing fields are built, the property will remain vacant.
"When the farmhouse is demolished, it will be an attractive site," Shaffer said. "We want to be responsible property owners."
Historical Preservation Stories: coming attractions
As I considered the issues showing up on the Amherst Historical Commission's docket and began to prepare my preservation class for the fall semester, it seemed to me that the question of demolitions of historic structures would furnish material for several brief posts as well as a longer, more synthetic one.
The immediate impetus was the destruction, this past spring, of a notable mid-nineteenth century house in the center of town, for creation of a private parking lot.
The demolition was, to my mind, and in the opinion of many, senseless, from the standpoints of both preservation practice and sounding town planning. That said, not only did the building not suit the plans of the property owners: its condition was only fair to poor, and no one had been able to develop an economically viable use for it. This epitomizes the dilemmas that preservationists and planners face. The image of a dramatic battle pitting heroic and idealistic preservationists against mercenary developers and philistine property-owners is a caricature or a fantasy. In very few cases are the issues so clear—and even when they are, the choices are not. Usually, in fact, the choices are difficult, and many end up as proverbial "judgment calls," in which one's verdict hangs not just on subjective preferences, but on contingent factors such as finances, the need to prioritize or triage, and so forth. Just the other day, when describing one such example to an acquaintance, she replied with a sigh, "Yes, reminds me of the days when I worked for the National Register of Historic Places, and we'd say to one another, 'so, what's your painful choice of the week?'"
I'm now more convinced than ever of the need for such a longer piece because, as chance would have it, the Historical Commission joined the list of town bodies that have been making the news in recent months. Demolition delays imposed on a wooden trolley-car barn and an extensive ornamental fence have generated some controversy. In the meantime, plans for creation of a local historic district—which would provide stronger but more subtle tools than just demolition delay—move slowly forward. And just this week, we took up the issue of whether an old farm property purchased by the town for purposes of open space/recreation and affordable housing should entail repurposing or demolition of the farmhouse (a brief note on the latter in a moment).
At any rate, more on all this soon. I've got to finish preparing for an outdoor class session in our historic 1730 West Cemetery and the later Wildwood park cemetery.
The immediate impetus was the destruction, this past spring, of a notable mid-nineteenth century house in the center of town, for creation of a private parking lot.
![]() |
before |
![]() |
after |
I'm now more convinced than ever of the need for such a longer piece because, as chance would have it, the Historical Commission joined the list of town bodies that have been making the news in recent months. Demolition delays imposed on a wooden trolley-car barn and an extensive ornamental fence have generated some controversy. In the meantime, plans for creation of a local historic district—which would provide stronger but more subtle tools than just demolition delay—move slowly forward. And just this week, we took up the issue of whether an old farm property purchased by the town for purposes of open space/recreation and affordable housing should entail repurposing or demolition of the farmhouse (a brief note on the latter in a moment).
At any rate, more on all this soon. I've got to finish preparing for an outdoor class session in our historic 1730 West Cemetery and the later Wildwood park cemetery.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Decision to demolish historic school building divides Schuylkill Township officials (philly.com)
- Better living through historic preservation (sfgate.com)
- Houston mayor pushes to protect historic buildings (chron.com)
- Could some flooded homes set for demolition be saved? (gazetteonline.com)
- Grass Valley's Architectural Legacy - Preserving The City's Historic Neighborhoods (yubanet.com)
- Time runs out on saving historic immigrant cottages in Cedar Rapids (gazetteonline.com)
- Group wants historic Wellington Heights mansion saved from demolition (gazetteonline.com)
- Preservation Committee members fight for Cedar Rapids' past (gazetteonline.com)
- Oct. 1 Deadline Set to Find Buyer for Historic Bainbridge School (kitsapsun.com)
- Fickett historic designation appeal before WeHo Council tonight (pinkbananaworld.com)
- Conjunto club is labeled historic (mysanantonio.com)
- Czech Village neighborhood report disputed (gazetteonline.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)